visium spatial sequencing data (Mendeley Ltd)
Structured Review

Visium Spatial Sequencing Data, supplied by Mendeley Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/visium+spatial+sequencing+data/pmc13201544-433-4-17?v=Mendeley+Ltd
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "FineST: contrastive learning integrates histology and spatial transcriptomics for nuclei-resolved ligand-receptor analysis"
Article Title: FineST: contrastive learning integrates histology and spatial transcriptomics for nuclei-resolved ligand-receptor analysis
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70528-7
Figure Legend Snippet: A HE-stained image of the Visium tissue section and adjacent Xenium section, alongside their alignment. One repeat is performed for the publicly available data. B Pearson correlation between FineST and iStar for all input genes, calculated after aggregating super-resolution data to spot resolution. C Spatial expression plots for OPRPN from left to right: Visium, Xenium, FineST and iStar. FineST enhances the signal relative to Visium and yields results more comparable to Xenium. D Pearson correlation for OPRPN in FineST, corresponding to panel ( C ). Each dot represents a Visium spot ( n = 4992) or overlapping Xenium pseudo-spot ( n = 3958). E Ground-truth cell type annotations at spot (Visium) and single-cell (Xenium) resolution, as reported previously . F FineST's predicted cell types at single-nucleus and sub-spot levels. G FineST accurately identifies the DCIS 2 cell type in a triple-positive receptor ROI. H Pearson correlation for cell type abundance and mean gene expression across each cell type, comparing FineST and iStar. Each dot represents a cell type (Left, n = 19) or gene (Right, n = 65), lines connect matched pairs. Diamond indicates the mean. Statistical significance was assessed by a paired two-sided t -test. I Three marked regions (ROI 1, ROI 2 and ROI 3) dominated by DCIS 1, DCIS 2 and Invasive tumor cells. J Cell type deconvolution from FineST, compared with Xenium ground truth, demonstrates FineST's results visually match the ground truth and outperform Visium’s lower resolution (see Supplementary Fig. ). Alongside, single-cell resolved CCC patterns identified using SparseAEH (cluster number 2) and pathway enrichment analysis for Pattern 0 correspond to interesting cell distributions. K Venn plot of significant LR pairs (FDR < 0.05) interacting in >25% (ROI 1, 5589 cells) or >20% (ROI 2, 3330 cells; ROI 3, 5853 cells) of cells. In total, 103, 146 and 159 pairs were selected for spatial clustering analysis in the three ROIs, respectively. L Comparative analysis of region- and cell-specific LR pairs reveals two unique pairs specific to DCIS 2 and Invasive tumor cells. For panels ( B ), ( H – J ), source data are provided in the Source Data file. Scare bars, 1 mm.
Techniques Used: Staining, Expressing, Single Cell, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: A , B Spatial plot of seven cell types estimated by cell2location (spot resolution) and FineST (single-cell resolution). A' , B' Zoon-in views of A and B . B'' Zoon-in view of the region marked in B' , where FineST increases resolution from 8 spots to 869 single cells. C Cell type composition from reference scRNA-seq and deconvolution at Visium spot and FineST single-cell levels. D Distribution and PCC of cell type proportions ( n = 7) for Visium spot (PCC = 0.24) and FineST single-cell (PCC = 0.64) resolutions vs reference scRNA-seq. E Pathologists identified 36 spots (of 1331) co-localized with tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS), important for antigen presentation and T cell activation. FineST's single-cell views validate TLS by T and B cell co-localization (see B'' ). F Three example spatially co-expressed LR pairs detected at FineST's single-cell resolution. G Visualization of PVR - TIGIT interaction among local single cells ( z -score FDR < 0.05). H Clustering of 633 significant LR pairs, from single-cell resolution, within selected ROI into three spatial patterns using SpatialDE. I Spatial co-localization of tumor and Treg cells, estimated by cell2location . J Spatially co-expressed LR pairs detected at FineST's single-cell resolution. Scatter plot of global Moran’s R and one-sided z -score p -values (orange: significant, FDR < 0.05, Benjamini-Hochberg correction), with examples highlighted. K Communication strength of CD70 - CD27 at single-cell resolution (color: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$1-{p}_{{{{\rm{local}}}}{z}_{p}}$$\end{document} 1 − p local z p ; mean strength: 0.45, interacting cells: 5961, occupancy: 49.2%). L Detection of local CCC patterns by clustering significant LR pairs. Top: original spot resolution (332 pairs, SpatialDE); Middle: sub-spot resolution (957 pairs, SparseAEH) and Bottom: single-nucleus resolution (931 pairs, SparseAEH). M Dot plots of enriched pathways in Pattern 0 and Pattern 1 (from L , Bottom), 2-by-2 contingency tables for MHC-I and WNT. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-sided Fisher’s exact test; dot size indicates p -value. N Sankey plot of selected L-R-TF-TG communication pathways. For panels (D , K ), box plots show median (center), IQR (box), whiskers at 1.5 × IQR, and points for seven cell types; violin plots show density, median (white line), and IQR (thick bar). For panels ( A ), ( J , L ), source data are provided in the Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Single Cell, Immunopeptidomics, Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A , B HE staining and cell type annotation of spatial transcriptomic spots in tumor tissues from an ICB non-responder (P1_T) and responder (P7_T) from the original study . In the non-responder (P1_T), a tumor immune barrier (TIB) structure is formed by SPP1 + macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). C , D Spatial signature score of SPP1 + macrophages and CAFs, spatial gene expression of CCR1 , and Pearson correlation between SPP1 + macrophage score and CCR1 expression across all spots (Visium vs FineST). The red line represents the fitted linear regression, and the shaded area corresponds to the 95% confidence interval. Statistical significance was assessed using a two-sided Pearson correlation test. E Scatterplot of global Moran’s R and one-sided z -score p -values for spatially co-expressed LR pairs detected using FineST-enhanced gene expression at spot-level resolution in ROI. Significant pairs (orange) were identified using FDR < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg correction). The CD274-PDCD1 interaction was detected in P1_T only. F Spatial gene expression of ligand CD274 and receptor PDCD1 across all spots (Visium vs FineST) for P1_T (non-responder) and P7_T (responder), respectively. For panels ( A , B , E ), source data are provided in the Source Data file. Part of the panels ( A , B ) is created in BioRender. Huang, Y. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fv0byvk .
Techniques Used: Staining, Gene Expression, Expressing
